Report: Textbook Pricing Affects Students' Rating of Profs

  • By Dian Schaffhauser
  • 11/06/18

According to a recent survey, faculty members who choose course materials that cost less than $30 are 10 times more likely to get a positive rating from students than a negative rating. And students tend to give far more negative ratings to their instructors when the cost of the textbook used in their class goes into the triple digits. Nearly half of students in the same survey (47 percent) also stated that they had to pay for a "homework system" along with a textbook.

The survey was undertaken by FlatWorld, a company that publishes textbooks at what it calls "an affordable price." Its titles start at $29.95; multi-semester textbooks are $39.95 and higher. Students can get full-color print versions, do a digital textbook download or use online access. The survey, taken by undergraduate students enrolled in courses during fall 2018, drew 334 online responses over the course of five days in October; names were pulled from a SurveyMonkey audience panel.

How the price of a textbook influences students' ratings of their professors

How the price of a textbook influences students' ratings of their professors. Source: "FlatWorld Textbook Cost Study," from FlatWorld.

During the semester, students spent an average of $403 on college course materials. A third (33 percent) said that the price of the assigned textbook influenced their decision to take a given class.

Also, the more expensive the textbook, the more likely students were to use loan money to cover the cost; while 15 percent of respondents overall said they use loans; that share rose to 25 percent among students who spent more than $600 during the semester on course materials.

"Students are keenly aware of the exorbitant costs of textbooks today, and are showing through their actions that they want professors and university administrators to do more to make learning materials affordable," said Alastair Adam, CEO of FlatWorld, in a statement. "Our findings make clear that textbook prices impact what classes students choose to take, as well as how they rate their professors."

A summary of findings is openly available on the FlatWorld website.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Three cubes of noticeably increasing sizes are arranged in a straight row on a subtle abstract background

    A Sense of Scale

    Gardner Campbell explores the notion of scale in education and shares some of his own experience "playing with scale" — scaling up and/or scaling down — in an English course at VCU.

  • AI-inspired background pattern with geometric shapes and fine lines in muted blue and gray on a dark background

    IBM Releases Granite 3.0 Family of Advanced AI Models

    IBM has introduced its most advanced family of AI models to date, Granite 3.0, at its annual TechXchange event. The new models were developed to provide a combination of performance, flexibility, and autonomy that outperforms or matches similarly sized models from leading providers on a range of benchmarks.

  • minimalist bookcase filled with textbooks featuring vibrant, solid-colored spines with no text, and a prominent number "25" displayed on one of the shelves

    OpenStax Celebrates 25th Anniversary

    OpenStax is celebrating its 25th anniversary as 2024 comes to a close. The open educational resources initiative from Rice University has served almost 37 million students in 153 countries and saved students nearly $3 billion in course material costs since its launch in 1999.

  • a professional worker in business casual attire interacting with a large screen displaying a generative AI interface in a modern office

    Study: Generative AI Could Inhibit Critical Thinking

    A new study on how knowledge workers engage in critical thinking found that workers with higher confidence in generative AI technology tend to employ less critical thinking to AI-generated outputs than workers with higher confidence in personal skills.