Skip to main content
Add as a preferred source on Google


Report: Textbook Pricing Affects Students' Rating of Profs

  • By Dian Schaffhauser
  • 11/06/18

According to a recent survey, faculty members who choose course materials that cost less than $30 are 10 times more likely to get a positive rating from students than a negative rating. And students tend to give far more negative ratings to their instructors when the cost of the textbook used in their class goes into the triple digits. Nearly half of students in the same survey (47 percent) also stated that they had to pay for a "homework system" along with a textbook.

The survey was undertaken by FlatWorld, a company that publishes textbooks at what it calls "an affordable price." Its titles start at $29.95; multi-semester textbooks are $39.95 and higher. Students can get full-color print versions, do a digital textbook download or use online access. The survey, taken by undergraduate students enrolled in courses during fall 2018, drew 334 online responses over the course of five days in October; names were pulled from a SurveyMonkey audience panel.

How the price of a textbook influences students' ratings of their professors

How the price of a textbook influences students' ratings of their professors. Source: "FlatWorld Textbook Cost Study," from FlatWorld.

During the semester, students spent an average of $403 on college course materials. A third (33 percent) said that the price of the assigned textbook influenced their decision to take a given class.

Also, the more expensive the textbook, the more likely students were to use loan money to cover the cost; while 15 percent of respondents overall said they use loans; that share rose to 25 percent among students who spent more than $600 during the semester on course materials.

"Students are keenly aware of the exorbitant costs of textbooks today, and are showing through their actions that they want professors and university administrators to do more to make learning materials affordable," said Alastair Adam, CEO of FlatWorld, in a statement. "Our findings make clear that textbook prices impact what classes students choose to take, as well as how they rate their professors."

A summary of findings is openly available on the FlatWorld website.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • artificial intelligence on laptop

    OpenAI to Combine AI Products into Desktop 'Superapp'

    OpenAI is reportedly developing a desktop application that would combine several of its emerging AI products into a single platform, according to reports, marking the latest step in the company's effort to transform ChatGPT from a standalone chatbot into a broader productivity and automation environment.

  • woman surrounded by virtual hologram icons

    Beyond AI Adoption: Designing Learning for an Age of Abundant Intelligence

    Higher education was designed for a world in which access to knowledge, expertise, feedback, mentorship, and authentic learning experiences were inherently scarce. By making many forms of intelligence increasingly abundant, AI is inherently redefining the existing paradigm.

  • digital brain with network connections

    Microsoft Moving to Internally Developed AI Models in Office Apps

    Microsoft is reportedly using its own in-house artificial intelligence models to handle some workloads in Excel and Outlook, offering new evidence that the company is moving its AI strategy beyond model development and into large-scale cost reduction.

  • Profile silhouette of a person thoughtfully touching their chin, overlaid with transparent data visualizations and digital interface elements suggesting artificial intelligence and analytics.

    The Institutional Knowledge Shift Is Reshaping Higher Ed IT

    Higher education IT leaders are navigating a quiet but consequential transition: Experienced team members are retiring or leaving for private-sector roles, and the teams replacing them are smaller, newer, and often stretched thin. The result is a structural shift in how technology decisions are made, executed, and sustained.