9 Benchmarks that Inform How a Student Chooses a School

man pointing to yes, no, maybe buttons

When faced with choosing between two institutions, how does a student make the decision about which college or university to attend? It's a combination of factors, according to a new report from Eduventures, the research arm of NRCCUA. Understanding those factors, according to the report, can help schools better prepare for changes in levels of student interest and influence the outcomes.

Researcher Kim Reid, an Eduventures principal analyst and author of the report, used data on nearly 76,000 students drawn from the company's "2018 Survey of Admitted Students." Each student had to make an enrollment choice between at least two schools and provided information and ratings about their ultimate enrollment choice and the next one in line. That analysis allowed Reid to produce an institution-level dataset with 151,676 sets of ratings for 1,383 four-year public and private nonprofit schools. (For-profits were left out of the analysis.)

From there, the research resulted in the development of "benchmarks" that institutions can use to "inform recruitment, yield and brand strategy." Those benchmarks covered nine areas:

  • Student mindsets, and specifically the share of students who belonged to each of six mindset categories identified by Eduventures. This benchmark can tell institutions which type of student chooses the school (for example, career pragmatist versus grad-school bound), whether they fit the student profile the school wants to attract, and whether there are other mindsets that would also be good fits;
  • Decision segments, or what among the various criteria for choosing a school — cost, reputation, career outcomes, etc. — was most important;
  • First choice, which indicated the level of commitment the student had coming into the school and whether the decision designated the choice as a "destination brand," a "safety school" or a signal that the student could decide to transfer out or fail to persist;
  • Destination, which showed where non-enrolling students were attending school, categorized by Carnegie classification and in-state versus out-of-state status;
  • Distance, measuring the number of miles between a student's home zip code and location of the school where they enrolled;
  • Brand constructs, how students rated their schools in multiple areas, including affordability, diversity, community feel and level of quality;
  • Quality perception gap, which showed how enrolling students compared to students who chose not to enroll in their perceptions of quality for such reasons as overall reputation, strength of program and job opportunities for graduates;
  • Communications, measuring the use of various components of enrollment outreach, including websites, publications, social media, campus visits and admitted student events; and
  • Net cost comparisons, showing the portion of students choosing to attend an institution with a lower, equal or higher net cost than the inquiring institution.

"Taken together, these nine benchmarks can help an institution examine its own survey of admitted student results," the report noted.

As Reid noted in her conclusion, "In the end, knowing whether or not your institution's admitted students behave like all admitted students in your category or whether you have idiosyncratic behaviors will help you craft and prioritize the enrollment strategies you need to be successful."

The report, "The Survey of Admitted Students," is available to Eduventures member institutions.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a former senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal, Campus Technology and Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • abstract illustration of a glowing AI-themed bar graph on a dark digital background with circuit patterns

    Stanford 2025 AI Index Reveals Surge in Adoption, Investment, and Global Impact as Trust and Regulation Lag Behind

    Stanford University's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) has released its AI Index Report 2025, measuring AI's diverse impacts over the past year.

  • modern college building with circuit and brain motifs

    Anthropic Launches Claude for Education

    Anthropic has announced a version of its Claude AI assistant tailored for higher education institutions. Claude for Education "gives academic institutions secure, reliable AI access for their entire community," the company said, to enable colleges and universities to develop and implement AI-enabled approaches across teaching, learning, and administration.

  • lightbulb

    Call for Speakers Now Open for Tech Tactics in Education: Overcoming Roadblocks to Innovation

    The annual virtual conference from the producers of Campus Technology and THE Journal will return on September 25, 2025, with a focus on emerging trends in cybersecurity, data privacy, AI implementation, IT leadership, building resilience, and more.

  • From Fire TV to Signage Stick: University of Utah's Digital Signage Evolution

    Jake Sorensen, who oversees sponsorship and advertising and Student Media in Auxiliary Business Development at the University of Utah, has navigated the digital signage landscape for nearly 15 years. He was managing hundreds of devices on campus that were incompatible with digital signage requirements and needed a solution that was reliable and lowered labor costs. The Amazon Signage Stick, specifically engineered for digital signage applications, gave him the stability and design functionality the University of Utah needed, along with the assurance of long-term support.